From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Tell user when ACPI is killing machine Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:25:09 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20031209112509.GF297@elf.ucw.cz> References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C05@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C05-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Yu, Luming" Cc: Aaron Lehmann , ACPI mailing list , kernel list List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > >> >cpufreq is not connected to acpi thermal subsystem. Dominik has some > >> >patches to change that, IIRC. > >> Is it merged into ACPI ? > > >Not yet, IIRC. It is pretty big patch. > > Would you please point out where they are? --Luming In http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=6219572, Dominik wrote: [This is what I was talking about; oops, google groups does not seem to index acpi-devel :-(]. Pavel From: Dominik Brodowski [PATCHES 2.6] ACPI processor driver updates [idle,throttling,cpufreq,thermal] 2003-10-06 13:00 The following patches which - a) replace the broken ACPI CPUfreq driver with a better, flexible variant, - b) modularize the processor.c code: instead of one large file there are many small files. - c) improve passive cooling support - d) allow for easy adding of proper locking and ref-counting in processor.c have been re-diffed against linux-2.6.0-test6-bk-current and are available on my website. Len, I'll send them to you in private e-mail for easier merging later. Please apply. Dominik http://www.brodo.de/patches/2003-10-06/acpi-2.6.0-test6-2-remove_previous_pstates_implementation The previous arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi.c CPUfreq driver was broken, of bad design, and needs to replaced by something better. But, as a first step, remove all parts related to P-States from ACPI code. http://www.brodo.de/patches/2003-10-06/acpi-2.6.0-test6-2-processor_submodules Add a "submodule interface" to drivers/acpi/processor.c It allows to create other "modules" which access the acpi_handle for the processor, and which get notified if the event value maches the value passed in acpi_processor_register_notify. http://www.brodo.de/patches/2003-10-06/acpi-2.6.0-test6-2-processor_perflib This patch adds a new "P-States library" to drivers/acpi/ CPUfreq drivers can now easly access the contents of the _PCT and the _PSS. For example, the speedstep-centrino driver could be appended so that it passes the appropriate value to the P-States library which then evaluates _PDC, and then returns the updated _PCT and _PSS. Also, the platform limit is now handled as a cpufreq notifier and as a call to cpufreq_policy_update. http://www.brodo.de/patches/2003-10-06/acpi-2.6.0-test6-2-new_acpi_io_driver This re-adds the acpi P-States I/O driver. It is much smaller, leaner and cleaner. http://www.brodo.de/patches/2003-10-06/acpi-2.6.0-test6-2-idle_submodule This moves the idle handler out of drivers/acpi/processor and into an own module. Even if only C1 is available, it is now used. If the user prefers the default pm_idle, he can unload processor_idle, and still have the other functionality available. http://www.brodo.de/patches/2003-10-06/acpi-2.6.0-test6-2-thermal_submodule This adds a new mechanism to manage passive cooling. Instead of hardcoded -and partly wrong- access to CPUfreq and ACPI throttling-, add a generic mechanism which other modules can register with. http://www.brodo.de/patches/2003-10-06/acpi-2.6.0-test6-2-thermal_cpufreq Use _any_ CPUfreq driver for passive cooling. Implemented by an cpufreq policy notifier and cpufreq_update_policy. http://www.brodo.de/patches/2003-10-06/acpi-2.6.0-test6-2-thermal_throttling Move throttling into its own submodule, and register it with the new passive cooling module. Also, the now-useless "limit" interface is removed. -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/