Re: Linux/ACPI 2.4 release status and cpufreq

[wwp <subscript-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Luca Capello,


On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:42:47 +0100 Luca Capello <luca-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> on 12/15/03 12:26, Micha Feigin wrote:
> | The cvs version (iirc mentioned earlier in this thread, otherwise
> | search the archives) applied cleanly to 2.4.23 last time I checked.
> well, I just got an error applying the latest 'cpufreq' from
> 	http://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/cpufreq/
> 
> Here's the error (I used a fresh 2.4.23 with the latest ACPI patch):
> | gismo:/usr/src/linux-2.4.23# bunzip2 -c
> ../kernel/cpufreq-LINUX_2_4-20031215.tar.bz2 | patch -p1
> | missing header for unified diff at line 57 of patch
> | patching file Documentation/00-INDEX
> | patching file Documentation/Configure.help
> | patching file Makefile
> | patching file arch/i386/boot/setup.S
> | patching file arch/i386/config.in
> | patching file arch/i386/kernel/Makefile
> | patching file arch/i386/kernel/i386_ksyms.c
> | patching file arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
> | patching file arch/i386/kernel/time.c
> | patching file drivers/Makefile
> | patching file include/asm-i386/ist.h
> | patching file include/asm-i386/msr.h
> | patching file include/asm-i386/smp.h
> | patching file include/linux/smp.h
> | patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
> | gismo:/usr/src/linux-2.4.23#

Using cpufreq-LINUX_2_4-20031215.tar.bz2, patching manually
w/ `patch -p1 --dry-run < patch` against a 2.4.33+acpi+ieee1394+
other-various-patches:

patching file Documentation/00-INDEX
patching file Documentation/Configure.help
patching file Makefile
patching file arch/i386/boot/setup.S
patching file arch/i386/config.in
patching file arch/i386/kernel/Makefile
patching file arch/i386/kernel/i386_ksyms.c
patching file arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
patching file arch/i386/kernel/time.c
patching file drivers/Makefile
patching file include/asm-i386/ist.h
patching file include/asm-i386/msr.h
patching file include/asm-i386/smp.h
patching file include/linux/smp.h

Seems OK here.


Regards,

-- 
wwp


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/