From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Subject: Re: Plea for help Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 18:08:54 -0800 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20031220180854.32e2f56d.rddunlap@osdl.org> References: <3FE28F79.601@comcast.net> <3FE33B69.1010606@netspace.org> <3FE39231.4040003@comcast.net> <20031219160947.79c3fcdf.rddunlap@osdl.org> <3FE3A142.90407@comcast.net> <20031219184043.3983572d.rddunlap@osdl.org> <3FE4A740.4080701@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3FE4A740.4080701-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Ian Pilcher Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 13:47:12 -0600 Ian Pilcher wrote: | Randy.Dunlap wrote: | > | > and exactly what kernel version is this? | > | | 2.4.23 with the 20031203 ACPI patch. I get basically the same behavior | with unpatched 2.4.23 or any of the Fedora Core kernels. Good. I only have unpatched 2.4.23 available currently (or 2.6.x). Is there some reason that you build a kernel with both APM and ACPI support? Can you test it without APM support, to see if it changes any? The dmesg files aren't complete boot logs. Can you provide complete boot logs for these 2 cases (panic & hang)? -- ~Randy ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click