From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karol Kozimor Subject: Re: Interrupt routing problem Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:47:46 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040106084745.GA30826@hell.org.pl> References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C75@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1073362251.2419.21.camel@dhcppc4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1073362251.2419.21.camel-D2Zvc0uNKG8@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Len Brown Cc: Luming Yu , Nils Faerber , ACPI Developers List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Thus wrote Len Brown: > Depending on your hardware, acpi_irq_balance, perhaps with > acpi_irq_pci=... could distribute some devices off IRQ9. However, IRQ9 > is only the 5th most active entry, so this may not help. The problem is that this box's BIOS points all the interrupt links to IRQ9 by default and as far as I remember, neither acpi_irq_pci= nor acpi_balance_irqs help. Is the off-one bug in printing IRQs still present? Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click