From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karol Kozimor Subject: Re: Interrupt routing problem Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:05:31 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040107090531.GA32086@hell.org.pl> References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C83@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C83-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Yu, Luming" Cc: "Brown, Len" , Nils Faerber , ACPI Developers List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Thus wrote Yu, Luming: > >The problem is that this box's BIOS points all the interrupt links to > IRQ9 > >by default and as far as I remember, neither acpi_irq_pci= nor > Let me see the DSDT.. See bugzilla #1185 for all the info. > >acpi_balance_irqs help. > >Is the off-one bug in printing IRQs still present? > I didn't remember bug about printing IRQs. I remember Len writing about one, I'll dig up the old email and point you to the correct entry (basically, it was about not printing / taking into account default BIOS links settings under certain conditions). Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click