From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wwp Subject: Re: 2.4.24 patch apply failed on vanilla kernel Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:50:54 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040107165054.1fbfc829@tethys> References: <20040107134658.5afa9142.acpi@thermoman.de> <20040107155325.5bfceba0@tethys> <20040107163907.391c146e.acpi@thermoman.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040107163907.391c146e.acpi-X2Xph2rMQzhn68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Marcel Meckel List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Marcel Meckel, On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:39:07 +0100 Marcel Meckel wrote: > > It is like if the acpi patch is based on a 2.4.24+uv1 patch (that > > replaces the use of NR_CPUS w/ BITS_PER_LONG). Quite easy to fix by > > hand, simply override the for (..) line w/ the one provided by the > > acpi patch. > > I changed the patch file and then patch applied without errors on > vanilla kernel. I did the same. This should work. Anyway official acpi patch would have to be updated. Regards, -- wwp ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html