From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: 2.6.1 - IRQ routing regression on Abit VP6 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:17:42 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040114101742.GQ14031@poupinou.org> References: <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD8D5FEB8@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4004D220.8010804@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4004D220.8010804-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Ian Pilcher Cc: "Li, Shaohua" , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:22:40PM -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote: > Li, Shaohua wrote: > >Did you open CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR? Please try close it or try the > >attached patch. > > It sounds like you may not have read all the way to the bottom. I was > able to get 2.6.1 working by updating the ACPI to version 20031203. > > So I wasn't asking for help, just reporting a bug. (And generally > complaining about such an ugly regressing in a supposedly stable kernel > series.) > It's just a stupid though, and I'm certainly wrong. Unless there is a 2.7 tree, 2.6 can't be considered "stable". -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html