From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [PATCH 2.6] update passive cooling algorithm Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:24:29 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040116112429.GV14031@poupinou.org> References: <20040111211255.GA31105@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040112154611.GH14031@poupinou.org> <20040112173922.GA6154@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040112191122.GK14031@poupinou.org> <20040115121833.GB12963@elf.ucw.cz> <20040115134229.GT14031@poupinou.org> <20040115223425.GC18488@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040115223425.GC18488@elf.ucw.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk To: Pavel Machek Cc: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:34:25PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > I guess throttling is way too fast (in kHz range, IIRC), so there > should not be any strange effects. Agreed. > > > > [Have you seen that "first use of PentiumPro in house appliances" > > > picture?] > > > > No, but I do have seen some that have burnt in a production server, > > some years ago... > > There was a picture of four-plate cooker, with PPro in the middle of > each plate. Can't work, unless you like carbon.. -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.