From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: [ACPI] [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq fixups Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:32:07 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040116193207.GC14031@poupinou.org> References: <20040115233215.GC5386@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040116140144.GW14031@poupinou.org> <20040116093404.S76365@root.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040116093404.S76365@root.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk To: Nate Lawson Cc: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:35:11AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > > > - fix OOPS when PST has core_frequency values of zero > > > > FYI: That one have been fixed by Nate Lawson by calling _INI for processors. > > I don't know if it is in acpi-ca yet. Of course, it is still safe > > to check if freq is 0. > > I was told it was in 20031203 but I don't know what Linux kernel version > has that dist. I haven't checked to be sure since my FreeBSD cpufreq code > is in a rough state right now. :) Well, my question was for ACPI-CA. Now, if that is put in Linux, or not, who cares ;) BTW, I installed a FreeBSD. I will be happy to test some FreeBSD cpufreq code. -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.