From: Dominik Brodowski <linux-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7BvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org>
To: christian graf <chr.graf-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: acpi_processor.c - kernel 2.6.1
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:37:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040119093703.GD11081@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1074447711.719.13.camel-GKM3wtwTCu0@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 336 bytes --]
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 06:41:51PM +0100, christian graf wrote:
> I thought for full performance the C1 state is better as the C2 (which
> keeps good performance as well as powersavings)? Or why do you prefer
> C2?
C1 and C2 have much less influence to both performance and powersaving than
the various P-States...
Dominik
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-19 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-17 23:43 acpi_processor.c - kernel 2.6.1 christian graf
[not found] ` <1074382993.674.24.camel-GKM3wtwTCu0@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 2:58 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20040118025845.GB25416-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 17:41 ` christian graf
[not found] ` <1074447711.719.13.camel-GKM3wtwTCu0@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-19 9:37 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2004-01-18 11:18 ` Yury V. Umanets
[not found] ` <1074424728.1914.24.camel-YqzrDssuZYw@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 13:00 ` Luca Capello
[not found] ` <400A8381.2050607-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 17:10 ` Mattia Dongili
[not found] ` <20040118171017.GF2375-MEqNC12sBsHxa7XIdbXXog@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 18:04 ` Luca Capello
[not found] ` <400ACAC3.1050504-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 19:28 ` christian graf
2004-01-18 17:39 ` christian graf
2004-01-19 14:10 ` Ducrot Bruno
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-18 8:14 Yu, Luming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040119093703.GD11081@dominikbrodowski.de \
--to=linux-x3ehhduj6siigcdfoqap7bvvk+yq3zxh@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=chr.graf-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox