From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: acpi_processor.c - kernel 2.6.1 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:37:03 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040119093703.GD11081@dominikbrodowski.de> References: <1074382993.674.24.camel@dragon> <20040118025845.GB25416@poupinou.org> <1074447711.719.13.camel@dragon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T7mxYSe680VjQnyC" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1074447711.719.13.camel-GKM3wtwTCu0@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: christian graf Cc: Ducrot Bruno , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org --T7mxYSe680VjQnyC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 06:41:51PM +0100, christian graf wrote: > I thought for full performance the C1 state is better as the C2 (which > keeps good performance as well as powersavings)? Or why do you prefer > C2? C1 and C2 have much less influence to both performance and powersaving than the various P-States...=20 Dominik --T7mxYSe680VjQnyC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAC6U/Z8MDCHJbN8YRAjWYAJ42cMfEC+Vvw7QDxmM14Dz8JcHGewCfR8zk 8UtnWJphzI4L0xqza1ideUQ= =8GW3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T7mxYSe680VjQnyC-- ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn