From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: ACPI Extensions for Display Adapters Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:16:43 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040124001643.GL25416@poupinou.org> References: <20040123231334.GJ25416@poupinou.org> <20040123234459.GB18100@hell.org.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040123234459.GB18100-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Brown, Len" , acpi-devel List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 12:44:59AM +0100, Karol Kozimor wrote: > Thus wrote Ducrot Bruno: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:35:00PM -0500, Brown, Len wrote: > > > Volunteers? > > > > This is perhaps time to add some attribute to sysfs? > > BTW: did anybody actually think of moving the Linux-specific bits to sysfs? > I guess killing /proc/acpi would be a 2.7-thing though. > Best regards, Sometimes, I'm thinking about, but well, never got time to do it (it's not in my priority list)... -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn