From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: List noise. Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:41:59 +0000 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040127144159.GP29296@redhat.com> References: <1075213084.1633.95.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075213084.1633.95.camel-8OOqt/S+jKAjOxct69p1dh/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: David Woodhouse Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:18:05PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > All this noise on the list would be so easily avoided if the list wasn't > accepting messages without a Message-ID, and wasn't accepting bounces. > > It's not hard -- it'd take _moments_ to protect the list against this. if you had control over the MTA, yes. Sourceforget lists don't offer this power sadly. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn