From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: ACPI patch flow Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:28:33 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040203122832.GA1405@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1075747579.2394.108.camel@dhcppc4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075747579.2394.108.camel-D2Zvc0uNKG8@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Len Brown Cc: ACPI Developers List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > In an effort to make sure the latest ACPI patch is widely available, I > currently publish it both as bk trees and plain patches > http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/ > http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/release/ > > against 7 releases: > > 2.4.22 > 2.4.23 > 2.4.24 > 2.4.25 > > 2.6.0 > 2.6.1 > 2.6.2 > > I'd like to stop maintaining (and delete) 2.4.23 -- with the release of > 2.4.24, I doubt anybody is using 2.4.23. > > I'd like to stop maintaining (and delete) 2.6.0 -- with the release of > 2.6.1, I doubt anybody is using 2.6.0. Also, 2.6.1 has diverged > somewhat from 2.6.0, so maintaining 2.6.0 has become problematic. > > let me know if you have any issues with this. I do not see any problems with that. For 2.6, if I were you, I'd drop 2.6.1, too. People should upgrade to latest if they have problems.. -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn