From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruno Ducrot Subject: Re: ACPI state 4 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:13:51 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040203131351.GC882@poupinou.org> References: <80712959.1075733001@HELPDESK-PC13.fdl.pitt.edu> <20040203123229.GB1405@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040203123229.GB1405-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Pavel Machek Cc: Henry Umansky , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 01:32:29PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > I just compiled Linux kernel 2.6.1 with ACPI support and I wanted to test > > out the different sleep states. So I ran the command: > > > > $echo 4 > /proc/acpi/sleep > > I suggest doing > > sync; echo 4 > sleep > > ...just to be safe. It's fine also to test in single mode. -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn