From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Kessel Subject: Re: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_TIME in 2.6.1/20040116 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:41:41 -0500 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040203234141.GA8327@bostoncoop.net> References: <20040203172413.GA1299@joehill.bostoncoop.net> <20040203143906.B33512@root.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040203143906.B33512-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Nate Lawson Cc: acpi-devel-TtF/mJH4Jtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:40:16PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > We moved to a 100 ms timeout on EC requests for FreeBSD because some > devices just couldn't respond quicker. But I think there's a larger issue > somewhere here where interrupts are being lost. Is FreeBSD using the same ACPI code base? Is there an easy patch to apply to test to see if this eliminates or mitigates the problem? -- Adam Kessel http://bostoncoop.net/adam ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn