From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Adam Kessel <adam-/J5p37YCQWYytDrLOV7HaA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Nate Lawson <nate-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org>,
acpi-devel-TtF/mJH4Jtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_TIME in 2.6.1/20040116
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:32:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040204103226.GI882@poupinou.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040203234141.GA8327-/J5p37YCQWYytDrLOV7HaA@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 06:41:41PM -0500, Adam Kessel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:40:16PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > We moved to a 100 ms timeout on EC requests for FreeBSD because some
> > devices just couldn't respond quicker. But I think there's a larger issue
> > somewhere here where interrupts are being lost.
>
> Is FreeBSD using the same ACPI code base?
For EC I tend to say 'no'.
> Is there an easy patch to apply
> to test to see if this eliminates or mitigates the problem?
Under driver/acpi/ec.c
you have a
#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY_COUNT 1000
Try with
#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY_COUNT 10000
That should give you a 100ms timeout.
--
Bruno Ducrot
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
-- Don't know. Don't care.
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-04 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-03 17:24 Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_TIME in 2.6.1/20040116 Adam Kessel
[not found] ` <20040203172413.GA1299-H/G4Yv+sbq78nmnftgJBZjK0Oss5Xsdo@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-03 22:40 ` Nate Lawson
[not found] ` <20040203143906.B33512-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-03 23:41 ` Adam Kessel
[not found] ` <20040203234141.GA8327-/J5p37YCQWYytDrLOV7HaA@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-04 10:32 ` Bruno Ducrot [this message]
[not found] ` <20040204103226.GI882-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-04 20:40 ` Adam Kessel
[not found] ` <20040204204055.GA8434-H/G4Yv+sbq78nmnftgJBZjK0Oss5Xsdo@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-05 9:38 ` Bruno Ducrot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040204103226.GI882@poupinou.org \
--to=ducrot-kk6yzipjem5g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-TtF/mJH4Jtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=adam-/J5p37YCQWYytDrLOV7HaA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nate-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox