From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Lukas Schrangl <schrangl-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Build PST for AthlonXP
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:18:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040204111817.GJ882@poupinou.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11695.1075891525-uoI8PbPD7Nlmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 11:45:25AM +0100, Lukas Schrangl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I don't know wether this is the right mailinglist for my problem, but at
> least I think here are some people who can help me.
Correct, the mailling list is the CPUFreq mailing list..
> Maybe someone remembers my problem: I have a AMD Athlon XP 2600+ mobile CPU
> but neither ACPI- performance states nor cpufreq/powernow-k7 (no PST matching
> this cpuid) do work.
Retrieving configuration from ACPI is a work in progress. I do have
some experimental patch for, but not publically available yet
(it depends on others patches from Dominik, I'm not sure if that OK by
now).
> Recently I browsed a bit through the powernow-k7 source and have now an idea
> how it works. It shouldn't be too difficult to set up my own PST for my CPU,
> should it?
Well, not so, especially if you can retrieve the configuration for the different
states.
The key is the control word, in the _PSS packages.
For example, suppose you have that:
Processor(..) {
...
Name (_PSS, Package () { /* this may be a method, btw */
Package () {
0x0352,
0x61A8,
0x7D,
0x009C414B, /* that the control. */
0x014B
},
Package () {
...,
...,
}
})
For the first one, this is 0x009C414B.
The layout seems to be:
bit 0-5: FID,
bit 6-10: VID,
bit 11-30: SGTC (or in other word 'latency' in 10 time micro second)
bit 31-32: reserved.
Note that this is *not* confirmed by AMD people.
> I know about FIDs and VIDs and what they are good for, but can anyone
> explain me the structure of a PST and the PSB (links to some documents, ...)?
> The second thing: I could get the cpu- frequences that seem work (for my
> FIDs) from my SSDT, but how can I calculate the voltage (for the VIDs) matching
> the frequency, if there are only the mW given in the SSDT?
>
BTW, I send to CPUFreq ML yesterday a patch in order to get a sysctl
interface for overwritting a powernow k7 table.
http://www.poupinou.org/cpufreq/powernow-k7/
Cheers,
--
Bruno Ducrot
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
-- Don't know. Don't care.
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-04 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-04 10:45 Build PST for AthlonXP Lukas Schrangl
[not found] ` <11695.1075891525-uoI8PbPD7Nlmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-04 11:18 ` Bruno Ducrot [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-05 7:17 Lukas Schrangl
[not found] ` <23215.1075965473-4qq0xPmsfhVmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-05 10:16 ` Bruno Ducrot
2004-02-05 14:01 Lukas Schrangl
[not found] ` <15986.1075989680-QaGsrjdPBgFmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-06 16:37 ` Bruno Ducrot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040204111817.GJ882@poupinou.org \
--to=ducrot-kk6yzipjem5g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=schrangl-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox