From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: acpi=force safe? Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 06:40:23 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040206064023.2a80a4dd.ak@suse.de> References: <40678.65.28.18.238.1076044455.squirrel@mail.diamondcpu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <40678.65.28.18.238.1076044455.squirrel-gjzqEhKAtSBis2HOlLKa7kEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Nick Bartos Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 23:14:15 -0600 (CST) "Nick Bartos" wrote: > I can do acpi=force, but I worry about causing stability issues. If the machine works with that it is safe. However many older boards have broken ACPI, that is why it is disabled by default for older boards. -Andi ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn