From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruno Ducrot Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 00:11:24 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040206231124.GK13262@poupinou.org> References: <200402062058.i16KwPA5028014@lap1.smtl.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402062058.i16KwPA5028014-epL5dT2ynbxW7IvYoCtsgA@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Pete Phillips Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, acpi4asus-user-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 08:58:25PM +0000, Pete Phillips wrote: > Hi > > I took delivery yesterday of an ASUS s1300N laptop. I have got 2.4.22 > and 2.4.24 kernels with latest acpi patches. (I am running Suse 9.0 - > the default kernel sucks with almost 100% keventd sucking the life out of > the thing). > > If I boot with acpi=off they boot perfectly well, minus of course acpi > support! Also boot OK with acpi=ht. > > However, with acpi=on, they just hang after the "linux loading" > sequence. > > dmesg says that the ACPI has wakeup address 0xc0001000. > > I am completely flumoxed ! I have seen numerous docs claiming that the > S1300N is fine with ACPI, so either the BIOS in mine is different (?) or > I am being a complete prat. (I accept that the latter is highly likely!) > Booting with nolapic or noapic options perhaps? -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn