From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karol Kozimor Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] acpi_hw_[enable|disable]_non_wakeup_gpe_block Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:31:30 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040215193130.GA14083@hell.org.pl> References: <200402142317.41033.a.malysh@centrium.de> <200402151647.21826.a.malysh@centrium.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402151647.21826.a.malysh-1WJ9BOJEYl0b1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Alexander Malysh Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Thus wrote Alexander Malysh: > Hi again, > > after some more testing, I have found a cause for this. > We disable non wakeup gpes (and store those values) with interrupts disabled, > but enable those with interrupts enabled which were already overwritten while > handling of wakeup interrupt[1]. So we must restore non wakeup gpes as long > interrupts are disabled. Attached patch should fix it. > > P.S. With patch attached sleep button works after S1 resume... [...] How does this relate to bugs #1409 and #1661? I still need to apply the #1409 patch or else my ACPI interrupts are lost after resume from S1 / S3. Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click