From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karol Kozimor Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi_leave_sleep_state (was: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] acpi_hw_[enable|disable]_non_wakeup_gpe_block) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:11:26 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040217001126.GB11190@hell.org.pl> References: <200402142317.41033.a.malysh@centrium.de> <20040215200724.GN13262@poupinou.org> <200402152200.08010.a.malysh@centrium.de> <200402152312.53837.a.malysh@centrium.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402152312.53837.a.malysh-1WJ9BOJEYl0b1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Alexander Malysh Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Bruno Ducrot List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Thus wrote Alexander Malysh: > Hi again, > > what are you think about attached patch? > > Note: at least on my laptop gpes must be enabled before '_WAK' method > execution, otherwise after '_WAK' was executed interrupts are enabled and gpe > register were restored with wrong values... > > @Karol: can you please get this patch a try? It does help, ACPI interrupts are fine after resume. Overall it works the same as the one for bug#1409, but the approach is better. Len, please apply, possibly even for 2.6.3? Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click