From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Behlert Subject: Re: ACPI C4 support Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:17:46 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040302101746.GS2624@suse.de> References: <20040228161011.GA10448@elf.ucw.cz> <20040301152810.GT2869@poupinou.org> <20040301180958.GI2624@suse.de> <20040301194825.GB2869@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040301194825.GB2869-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Bruno Ducrot Cc: Pavel Machek , ACPI mailing list , trenn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org, len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Moin, Thanks for the information. With it I can communicate what's wrong and how to fix it. Helps us a lot. ciao, Stefan On Mar 01, 04 20:48:25 +0100, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:09:58PM +0100, Stefan Behlert wrote: > > > > Is the '7' the BIOS-developer mentioned the same '7' as mentioned by you? > > > > No. Bad documentation. Change documentation. Look at acpi spec at > http://www.acpi.info/ > > You can define only latencies for C2 and C3 via FADT, so if you allow > C4 via the p_blk, you *don't* have latency for C4. You *must* define C4 > in a _CST object in order to get at least the latency, amongst other > informations. > > -- > Bruno Ducrot -- Stefan Behlert, SUSE LINUX AG, Mobile Devices Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany Phone +49-(0)911-74053-173 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click