From: Sebastian Seifert <lathander-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
"Grover,
Andrew" <andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"Therien,
Guy" <guy.therien-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"Yu, Luming" <luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: mutexes and preemption
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:22:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040304102212.GA2303@ergo.gotdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CFF522B18982EA4481D3A3E23B83141C01C988CE-sBd4vmA9Se6SsB6bSF6DdVDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 05:08:53PM -0800, Moore, Robert wrote:
>
> Looking at the timestamps in the debug output, I suspect that the real
> issue here is this line:
>
> Mar 2 23:03:10 tenshi kernel: osl-0909 [2049] os_wait_semaphore
> : Failed to acquire semaphore[dffd8680|1|36863], AE_TIME
>
> Because this wait should have been for 37 seconds (36863 milliseconds),
> yet not one second has gone by on the wall clock.
>
> A close look at the Linux implementation of os_wait_semaphore may again
> be in order.
You are right, thank you. I believe there is a bug in
os_wait_semaphore: the return value of down_trylock isn't checked
correctly, leading to the immediate failure of an Acquire with timeout
in the case the semaphore cannot be acquired immediately . I've sent a
patch to this list. I hope someone applies it.
Sebastian
--
A bad analogy is like leaky screwdriver.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-04 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-04 1:08 mutexes and preemption Moore, Robert
[not found] ` <CFF522B18982EA4481D3A3E23B83141C01C988CE-sBd4vmA9Se6SsB6bSF6DdVDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
2004-03-04 10:22 ` Sebastian Seifert [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-03 23:59 Moore, Robert
2004-03-03 7:05 Yu, Luming
[not found] ` <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401CBB713-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2004-03-03 7:24 ` Sebastian Seifert
2004-03-02 22:51 Sebastian Seifert
[not found] ` <20040302225117.GA1660-nlVyBo/8EO9N0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2004-03-03 11:43 ` Sebastian Seifert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040304102212.GA2303@ergo.gotdns.org \
--to=lathander-mmb7mzphnfy@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=guy.therien-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox