Re: [ACPI] [PATCH 1/2] 2.6: use scaling_available_freqs in acpi-cpufreq-ioport driver

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

Hi!

+0100, Bruno Ducrot wrote:
> > > --- clean/include/linux/cpufreq.h	2004-01-09 20:24:26.000000000 +0100
> > > +++ linux/include/linux/cpufreq.h	2004-03-01 19:02:48.000000000 +0100
> > > @@ -316,6 +316,7 @@
> > >  	unsigned int	index;     /* any */
> > >  	unsigned int	frequency; /* kHz - doesn't need to be in ascending
> > >  				    * order */
> > > +	unsigned int	voltage;   /* mV */
> > >  };
> > 
> > Well, why not?
> 
> Four reasons:
> 
> 1.) not all cpufreq drivers which use frequency table helpers know the
> voltage
> 
> 2.) most cpufreq drivers don't need to know the voltage -- they need to know
> a value [==index] to be written to some sort of register [msr/io/whatever].
> 
> 3.) sizeof(struct cpufreq_table_entry)
> 
> 4.) the overrides discussed for k{7,8} are very driver-specific and do
> neither belong into the cpufreq core nor into the cpufreq frequency table
> helpers. 

After seeing k7 table that contains specific parameters (settle time etc)
for each state, I have to agree that what I suggested is bad idea.


-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms