public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Simon Derr <Simon.Derr-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix(Fix _STA checking in acpi_bus_add)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:49:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040429184902.GC578@poupinou.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200404290846.41647.bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 08:46:41AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thursday 29 April 2004 2:18 am, Simon Derr wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > 
> > > Is your box based on Intel chipsets and/or firmware?  You might be
> > Indeed.
> > 
> > > suffering from the problem I described here:
> > >
> > >     https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=6923358
> > >
> > > Intel firmware seems to describe the PCI root bridge where chipset
> > > configuration space lives with _STA==0x8.  The spec says this means
> > > "functional, but not present".  The current Linux code ignores things
> > > that are "not present".
> > 
> > I tried your patch and it works perfectly. Thank you.
> > This chipset/firmware is probably very common in the ia64 world so I think
> > it might be a good idea to include your patch in the stock Linux kernel.
> 
> Well, the patch is a gross hack for a special case, and I'd be worried
> about it breaking something related to docking or hotplug.  That's why
> I posted it as "RFC" first, in the hope that someone could explain the
> intent behind the Intel firmware.

Note that my previous post is how I interpret the specs.  I can be
completely wrong, and thinks like breaking docking etc. is only based on
my interpretation.

> Given the current ACPI spec, I'd say it's a bug in the Intel firmware,
> and any workaround should be specific to that firmware.  If Intel
> figures out good semantics for what they're trying to do, I think that
> should be reflected in a future spec.

It's up to real ACPI experts, like Bob, to tell actually what means
exactly that funny 0x8 returned from _STA.

-- 
Bruno Ducrot

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-04-29 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-28 14:18 [PATCH] fix(Fix _STA checking in acpi_bus_add) Simon Derr
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404281525160.30907-64bZMsc4qGVEtYaxpPmRp1aPQRlvutdw@public.gmane.org>
2004-04-28 14:25   ` Matthew Wilcox
     [not found]     ` <20040428142557.GB22558-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2004-04-28 14:53       ` Simon Derr
     [not found]         ` <Pine.A41.4.53.0404281637220.37100-uSTK/MBzOD2tas8oWxsmKKkcovwApn/9@public.gmane.org>
2004-04-28 15:34           ` Bjorn Helgaas
     [not found]             ` <200404280934.26381.bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
2004-04-29  8:18               ` Simon Derr
     [not found]                 ` <Pine.A41.4.53.0404291005470.37100-uSTK/MBzOD2tas8oWxsmKKkcovwApn/9@public.gmane.org>
2004-04-29 14:46                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
     [not found]                     ` <200404290846.41647.bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
2004-04-29 18:49                       ` Bruno Ducrot [this message]
2004-05-12  4:40                   ` Len Brown
     [not found]                     ` <1084336805.12353.143.camel-D2Zvc0uNKG8@public.gmane.org>
2004-05-12 21:49                       ` Len Brown
     [not found]                         ` <1084398577.12352.186.camel-D2Zvc0uNKG8@public.gmane.org>
2004-05-12 21:54                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-04-29  8:44               ` Bruno Ducrot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-29 15:10 Yu, Luming
2004-05-12 22:07 Moore, Robert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040429184902.GC578@poupinou.org \
    --to=ducrot-kk6yzipjem5g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Simon.Derr-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=willy-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox