Re: Never in C3

Nate Lawson
2004-06-15T19:03:43Z

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 14:06 +0100, Fred Labrosse wrote:
>
> > *C1: promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[000] usage[02058670]
> > C2: promotion[C3] demotion[C1] latency[020] usage[19743630]
> > C3: promotion[--] demotion[C2] latency[200] usage[00000000]
>
> My recollection is that if the latency is larger than 100, Linux will
> never use C3.

The C2 limit is 100, C3 is 1000.

-Nate