From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karol Kozimor Subject: Re: Re: PBLK length again Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:21:17 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040624162117.GA697@hell.org.pl> References: <20040620154726.GT20511@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <1087770015.23371.27.camel@djinn> <40D73F9E.4030805@pca.it> <1087850404.2501.43.camel@camel> <20040623133208.GA3152@message-id.gmane0305.slipkontur.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040623133208.GA3152-l0tNAEGuAhhzZ8+rp42Dbp9+tswZ0GTaehPwdyo5hKaELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Stefan Seyfried Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Thus wrote Stefan Seyfried: > IIRC there was a discussion on this list some time ago and the outcome was, > that intel once shipped a "BIOS programmers guide" which told that 7 was > allowed. Later they changed their mind and decided only 6 was correct. Well, since Intel shipped / still ships chipsets that actually do have a PBLK of length 7, that's somehow odd. Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com