From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: swsusp and ac status Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:53:05 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040624195304.GE698@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <20040623082653.A26014@fermat.unipv.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040623082653.A26014-xzhXYMPkGmXoPXhRcRtihA@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Daniele Boffi Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > I noticed that a change in the ac status is not detected after a swsusp. I > think this should be a known issue; is there any workaround available? Its known, and yes I have ugly workaround. > Same behavior with pm-suspend, swsusp and swsusp2. Can you try pm-suspend with powerdown mode set to "platform"? -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com