RE: Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6

RE: Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6

[Wang, Zhenyu Z]

 
The patch there needs to be reviewed...not enough time to do it now.
Thanks for pointing it out.
And another issue in thermal is bug 1770, my one line patch is there...

-zhen
-----Original Message-----
From: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org [mailto:acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Seyfried
Sent: 2004年6月23日 21:48
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: [ACPI] Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6

On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 02:42:14AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> Hi Linus, please do a 
> 
> 	bk pull bk://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/linux-acpi-release-2.6.7

What about http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2588
"Can set all but active[2] temperature via trip_points"

Will it go into mainline?
-- 
Stefan Seyfried



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Acpi-devel mailing list
Acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com

Re: Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6

[Stefan Seyfried]

On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:22:14PM +0800, Wang, Zhenyu Z wrote:
>  
> The patch there needs to be reviewed...not enough time to do it now.
> Thanks for pointing it out.

Pavel Machek sanity-checked it (my version, the simpler one in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=2730&action=view) so
i believe it is not that bad :-))
-- 
Stefan Seyfried


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com

RE: Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6

[Wang, Zhenyu Z]

Fine. It is simple.
How about to change " int active[9]; " 
to 
"int active[ACPI_THERMAL_MAX_ACTIVE];" ?

-zhen
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Seyfried [mailto:seife-T+3qhDtrTvDv8lqoKu5MV4HBZQ1bDw0s@public.gmane.org] 
Sent: 2004年6月25日 4:16
To: Wang, Zhenyu Z
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6

On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:22:14PM +0800, Wang, Zhenyu Z wrote:
>  
> The patch there needs to be reviewed...not enough time to do it now.
> Thanks for pointing it out.

Pavel Machek sanity-checked it (my version, the simpler one in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=2730&action=view) so
i believe it is not that bad :-))
-- 
Stefan Seyfried



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com

Re: Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6

[Stefan Seyfried]

On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 10:13:56AM +0800, Wang, Zhenyu Z wrote:
> 
> Fine. It is simple.
> How about to change " int active[9]; " 
> to 
> "int active[ACPI_THERMAL_MAX_ACTIVE];" ?

Of course. active[9] is in fact wrong, since it only gives us
active[0]...active[8], but later i use active[9] *blush*.
Well, it is probably better if i don't try to make a living based
on my C skills ;-)
Thanks for spotting this.
I admit that this patch looks a bit kludgy with all that "active[0],
active[1],..." stuff, but since the limit of 10 Trip points is
"hardcoded" in the ACPI spec, we can probably get away with that.
-- 
Stefan Seyfried



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com

Re: Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6

[Hiroshi Itoh]

>>    Useful to workaround C3 ipw2100 packet loss,
>>    reducing noise or boot issues on some models.
>>    http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3549
>>    
>>    For static processor driver, boot cmdline:
>>    processor.acpi_cstate_limit=2

>You certainly win "ugliest parameter of the month" contest :-).
>What about processor.max_cstate= or something?

Always you are not so gentle, but often cool. :-)

-Hiro


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click