* No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
@ 2004-06-25 10:48 Matthew Garrett
2004-06-26 0:05 ` Hamie
2004-06-26 16:42 ` [ACPI] " David Eriksson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2004-06-25 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
If I do an S3 suspend, my machine resumes correctly (Thinkpad X40,
acpi_sleep=s3_bios passed on the command line). If I have the ioapic
enabled, however, I get no interrupts after resume. Hacking in a call to
APIC_init_uniprocessor in the resume path improves things - I get edge
triggered interrupts, but anything flagged as level triggered doesn't
work. How can I get the ioapic fully initialised on resume?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
2004-06-25 10:48 No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend Matthew Garrett
@ 2004-06-26 0:05 ` Hamie
2004-06-26 16:42 ` [ACPI] " David Eriksson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Hamie @ 2004-06-26 0:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: linux-kernel, acpi-devel
Matthew Garrett wrote:
>If I do an S3 suspend, my machine resumes correctly (Thinkpad X40,
>acpi_sleep=s3_bios passed on the command line). If I have the ioapic
>enabled, however, I get no interrupts after resume. Hacking in a call to
>APIC_init_uniprocessor in the resume path improves things - I get edge
>triggered interrupts, but anything flagged as level triggered doesn't
>work. How can I get the ioapic fully initialised on resume?
>
>
I have an identical problem with an r50p. But I'm running PIC...
(Because the r50p doesn't seem to do APIC). Not sure if it's identical,
but after resuming, I get maybe 10 seconds of sound, OR 30 odd minutes
of networking (I know... Sounds strange)... Then neither...
H
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [ACPI] No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
2004-06-25 10:48 No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend Matthew Garrett
2004-06-26 0:05 ` Hamie
@ 2004-06-26 16:42 ` David Eriksson
2004-06-26 18:03 ` Hamie
2004-06-27 16:27 ` [ACPI] " Matthew Garrett
1 sibling, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: David Eriksson @ 2004-06-26 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: linux-kernel, acpi-devel
On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 12:48, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> If I do an S3 suspend, my machine resumes correctly (Thinkpad X40,
> acpi_sleep=s3_bios passed on the command line). If I have the ioapic
> enabled, however, I get no interrupts after resume. Hacking in a call to
> APIC_init_uniprocessor in the resume path improves things - I get edge
> triggered interrupts, but anything flagged as level triggered doesn't
> work. How can I get the ioapic fully initialised on resume?
Maybe you've found this bug?
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
--
-\- David Eriksson -/- www.2GooD.nu
"I personally refuse to use inferior tools because of ideology."
- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [ACPI] No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
2004-06-26 16:42 ` [ACPI] " David Eriksson
@ 2004-06-26 18:03 ` Hamie
[not found] ` <40DDBA7A.6010404-CM5YN7r2dWBr4tq51QLIbdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2004-06-27 16:27 ` [ACPI] " Matthew Garrett
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Hamie @ 2004-06-26 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Eriksson; +Cc: Matthew Garrett, linux-kernel, acpi-devel
David Eriksson wrote:
>On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 12:48, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>
>>If I do an S3 suspend, my machine resumes correctly (Thinkpad X40,
>>acpi_sleep=s3_bios passed on the command line). If I have the ioapic
>>enabled, however, I get no interrupts after resume. Hacking in a call to
>>APIC_init_uniprocessor in the resume path improves things - I get edge
>>triggered interrupts, but anything flagged as level triggered doesn't
>>work. How can I get the ioapic fully initialised on resume?
>>
>>
>
>Maybe you've found this bug?
>
>http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
>
>
>
I think you're right... I've applied the patch to 2.6.7, and I'm still
running after a boot-suspend-resume cycle. Hopefully it isn't just a
fluke :)
The original patch seems to have been logged at the time of 2.6.6. Was
it just too late to make 2.6.7? Will it be fixed in 2.6.8?
Thanks.
Hamish.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [ACPI] No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
2004-06-26 16:42 ` [ACPI] " David Eriksson
2004-06-26 18:03 ` Hamie
@ 2004-06-27 16:27 ` Matthew Garrett
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2004-06-27 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Eriksson; +Cc: linux-kernel, acpi-devel
On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 18:42 +0200, David Eriksson wrote:
> Maybe you've found this bug?
>
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
Yeah, that one was biting me, but it's not the one causing this bug.
cat /proc/interrupts shows that the ACPI interrupt is correctly set to
level triggered, but the ioapic isn't set up correctly so no interrupts
make it through. The same seems to be true for all other level-triggered
interrupts.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: [ACPI] No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
@ 2004-06-28 1:35 Li, Shaohua
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Li, Shaohua @ 2004-06-28 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: linux-kernel, acpi-devel
Currently we have no suspend/resume code for IOAPIC, we should add it.
For PIC mode, current 8259 resume code ignored IRQ level/edge trigger,
and it should be added.
Thanks,
Shaohua
>-----Original Message-----
>From: acpi-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:acpi-devel-
>admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Garrett
>Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:28 AM
>To: David Eriksson
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [ACPI] No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
>
>On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 18:42 +0200, David Eriksson wrote:
>
>> Maybe you've found this bug?
>>
>> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
>
>Yeah, that one was biting me, but it's not the one causing this bug.
>cat /proc/interrupts shows that the ACPI interrupt is correctly set to
>level triggered, but the ioapic isn't set up correctly so no interrupts
>make it through. The same seems to be true for all other
level-triggered
>interrupts.
>
>--
>Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
>Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
>digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
>unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
>_______________________________________________
>Acpi-devel mailing list
>Acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
@ 2004-06-28 6:20 Li, Shaohua
2004-06-28 8:48 ` Hamie
2004-06-28 20:50 ` Hamie
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Li, Shaohua @ 2004-06-28 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hamie
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
Hi,
I attached a new patch to handler all level triggered IRQs after resume
for 8259 in http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2643. Please try and
attach your test result on it.
Thanks,
Shaohua
>-----Original Message-----
>From: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org [mailto:acpi-devel-
>admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Hamie
>Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 4:27 AM
>Cc: Alexander Gran; linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; acpi-
>devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>Subject: Re: [ACPI] No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
>
>Hamie wrote:
>
>> Alexander Gran wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Am Sonntag, 27. Juni 2004 19:57 schrieb Hamie:
>>>
>>>
>>>> FWIW the sound & networking appear to run fine for a while after
>>>> resuming. But I just started a DVD. It ran fine for about 30
seconds
>>>> and
>>>> then the sound went. About 30 seconds later the video froze and the
app
>>>> (xine) has frozen also. (kill -9 time...).
>>>>
>>>
>>> <>
>>> I can confirm that here:
>>> after resuming, network completely works (yeah!).
>>> Sound doesn't.
>>> unloading/reloading the sound driver does not help.
>>> USB works jumpy (perhaps 5-10hz)
>>> Reloading does the trick for usb.
>>>
>>
>> Since it sounds like a different bug to 2643, (Similiar but the patch
>> that fixes the ethernet doesn't appear to doa lot for the sound).
>> I've opened a new one... #2965.
>>
>
>Seeing as sound was on IRQ5 and the patch for 2643 fixed the ethernet,
I
>added a
>(big hack here :) call to
>
> acpi_pic_sci_set_trigger(5, acpi_sci_flags.trigger);
>
>in acpi_pm_finish(u32 state); just after the call to set the IRQ
trigger
>for
>the acpi irq...
>
>Results in (kern.log)
>
>Jun 27 21:15:28 ballbreaker kernel: ACPI: IRQ9 SCI: Edge set to Level
>Trigger.
>Jun 27 21:15:28 ballbreaker kernel: ACPI: IRQ5 SCI: Edge set to Level
>Trigger.
>
>
>and then sound works after resume... Obviously not a very good fix as
it
>won't
>fix anything that uses somethign other than IRQ5.
>
>So... What should the correct fix be? Obviously some IRQ's triggers
aren't
>surviving the resume... But why... The timer (IRQ 0) obviously does...
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
>Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
>digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
>unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
>_______________________________________________
>Acpi-devel mailing list
>Acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
@ 2004-06-28 8:48 ` Hamie
2004-06-28 9:18 ` [ACPI] " Luca Capello
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Hamie @ 2004-06-28 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li, Shaohua
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
Li, Shaohua wrote:
>Hi,
>I attached a new patch to handler all level triggered IRQs after resume
>for 8259 in http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2643. Please try and
>attach your test result on it.
>
>
>
Uh.... That might work.... Except that after applying the patch &
restarting. Then suspend-resume I get another small problem... My
thinkpad (r50p) uses the power button to wake up from suspend... The
system wakes, but with this latest patch, acpid then kicks in & says
'Ohh! I saw him press the power button' and promptly shuts down...
here's my acpid logfile
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:27 2004] received event "button/sleep SLPB 00000080
00000001"
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:27 2004] executing action "/etc/acpi/sleep.sh"
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:27 2004] BEGIN HANDLER MESSAGES
ERROR: Module i810_audio does not exist in /proc/modules
Stopping hotplug subsystem:
input
net
pci
usb
done
ERROR: Module bluetooth is in use by rfcomm,l2cap
Starting hotplug subsystem:
input
net
pci
usb
** can't synthesize root hub events
done
/dev/hda:
setting standby to 240 (20 minutes)
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] END HANDLER MESSAGES
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] action exited with status 0
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] completed event "button/sleep SLPB 00000080
00000001"
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] received event "button/power PWRF 00000080
00000001"
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] executing action "/etc/acpi/powerbtn.sh"
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] BEGIN HANDLER MESSAGES
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] END HANDLER MESSAGES
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] action exited with status 0
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] completed event "button/power PWRF 00000080
00000001"
[Mon Jun 28 09:40:07 2004] exiting
[Mon Jun 28 09:41:08 2004] starting up
[Mon Jun 28 09:41:08 2004] 3 rules loaded
ballbreaker:/var/log#
Sleeps, wakes & a shutdown... Should acpid do that? (i.e. shouldn't it
eat the power button event that woke it up as a wakeup? Should it even
get that?) Or is it the previous patch for drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
resetting the IRQ9 to edge triggered that's killing me? (I'll try
removing that now).
TIA
Hamish.
>Thanks,
>Shaohua
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org [mailto:acpi-devel-
>>admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Hamie
>>Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 4:27 AM
>>Cc: Alexander Gran; linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; acpi-
>>devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>>Subject: Re: [ACPI] No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
>>
>>Hamie wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Alexander Gran wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>>Am Sonntag, 27. Juni 2004 19:57 schrieb Hamie:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>FWIW the sound & networking appear to run fine for a while after
>>>>>resuming. But I just started a DVD. It ran fine for about 30
>>>>>
>>>>>
>seconds
>
>
>>>>>and
>>>>>then the sound went. About 30 seconds later the video froze and the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>app
>
>
>>>>>(xine) has frozen also. (kill -9 time...).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>><>
>>>>I can confirm that here:
>>>>after resuming, network completely works (yeah!).
>>>>Sound doesn't.
>>>>unloading/reloading the sound driver does not help.
>>>>USB works jumpy (perhaps 5-10hz)
>>>>Reloading does the trick for usb.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Since it sounds like a different bug to 2643, (Similiar but the patch
>>>that fixes the ethernet doesn't appear to doa lot for the sound).
>>>I've opened a new one... #2965.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Seeing as sound was on IRQ5 and the patch for 2643 fixed the ethernet,
>>
>>
>I
>
>
>>added a
>>(big hack here :) call to
>>
>> acpi_pic_sci_set_trigger(5, acpi_sci_flags.trigger);
>>
>>in acpi_pm_finish(u32 state); just after the call to set the IRQ
>>
>>
>trigger
>
>
>>for
>>the acpi irq...
>>
>>Results in (kern.log)
>>
>>Jun 27 21:15:28 ballbreaker kernel: ACPI: IRQ9 SCI: Edge set to Level
>>Trigger.
>>Jun 27 21:15:28 ballbreaker kernel: ACPI: IRQ5 SCI: Edge set to Level
>>Trigger.
>>
>>
>>and then sound works after resume... Obviously not a very good fix as
>>
>>
>it
>
>
>>won't
>>fix anything that uses somethign other than IRQ5.
>>
>>So... What should the correct fix be? Obviously some IRQ's triggers
>>
>>
>aren't
>
>
>>surviving the resume... But why... The timer (IRQ 0) obviously does...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [ACPI] No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
2004-06-28 8:48 ` Hamie
@ 2004-06-28 9:18 ` Luca Capello
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Luca Capello @ 2004-06-28 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acpi-devel; +Cc: linux-kernel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
on 06/28/04 10:48, Hamie wrote:
> Li, Shaohua wrote:
>> I attached a new patch to handler all level triggered IRQs after resume
>> for 8259 in http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2643. Please try and
>> attach your test result on it.
> Uh.... That might work.... Except that after applying the patch &
> restarting. Then suspend-resume I get another small problem... My
> thinkpad (r50p) uses the power button to wake up from suspend... The
> system wakes, but with this latest patch, acpid then kicks in & says
> 'Ohh! I saw him press the power button' and promptly shuts down...
<cut>
> Sleeps, wakes & a shutdown... Should acpid do that? (i.e. shouldn't it
> eat the power button event that woke it up as a wakeup? Should it even
> get that?) Or is it the previous patch for drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> resetting the IRQ9 to edge triggered that's killing me? (I'll try
> removing that now).
this is a known /bug/, I experienced the same on my ancient ASUS M3N. It
has nothing to do with 'acpid'. Please refer to this thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=107291320113621&w=2
For the moment, you can use the workaround I proposed here
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=107333070225744&w=2
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA3+JiVAp7Xm10JmkRAoioAJ0Wm/HoUcW0CH2yePQvjB4YGJDs/gCdHd8S
NHmS97q0bfg8JOec6H7fFKs=
=J5E+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [ACPI] No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend
2004-06-28 6:20 Li, Shaohua
2004-06-28 8:48 ` Hamie
@ 2004-06-28 20:50 ` Hamie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Hamie @ 2004-06-28 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li, Shaohua; +Cc: linux-kernel, acpi-devel
Li, Shaohua wrote:
>Hi,
>I attached a new patch to handler all level triggered IRQs after resume
>for 8259 in http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2643. Please try and
>attach your test result on it.
>
>
>
[Sorry if some see this twice... It bounced when I sent it before]
Uh.... That might work.... Except that after applying the patch &
restarting. Then suspend-resume I get another small problem... My
thinkpad (r50p) uses the power button to wake up from suspend... The
system wakes, but with this latest patch, acpid then kicks in & says
'Ohh! I saw him press the power button' and promptly shuts down...
here's my acpid logfile
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:27 2004] received event "button/sleep SLPB 00000080
00000001"
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:27 2004] executing action "/etc/acpi/sleep.sh"
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:27 2004] BEGIN HANDLER MESSAGES
ERROR: Module i810_audio does not exist in /proc/modules
Stopping hotplug subsystem:
input
net
pci
usb
done
ERROR: Module bluetooth is in use by rfcomm,l2cap
Starting hotplug subsystem:
input
net
pci
usb
** can't synthesize root hub events
done
/dev/hda:
setting standby to 240 (20 minutes)
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] END HANDLER MESSAGES
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] action exited with status 0
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] completed event "button/sleep SLPB 00000080
00000001"
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] received event "button/power PWRF 00000080
00000001"
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] executing action "/etc/acpi/powerbtn.sh"
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] BEGIN HANDLER MESSAGES
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] END HANDLER MESSAGES
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] action exited with status 0
[Mon Jun 28 09:39:43 2004] completed event "button/power PWRF 00000080
00000001"
[Mon Jun 28 09:40:07 2004] exiting
[Mon Jun 28 09:41:08 2004] starting up
[Mon Jun 28 09:41:08 2004] 3 rules loaded
ballbreaker:/var/log#
Sleeps, wakes & a shutdown... Should acpid do that? (i.e. shouldn't it
eat the power button event that woke it up as a wakeup? Should it even
get that?) Or is it the previous patch for drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
resetting the IRQ9 to edge triggered that's killing me? (I'll try
removing that now).
[Note, I've recieved a note regarding the wakeup & shutdown problem...
It's a bug perhaps? Does anyone know whether the bug is that acpi
shouldn't get the power button event after the resume? Or is it a bug
that acpid itself doesn't eat the event as we've just resumed (How does
it know the button was to wakeup & wasn't really to shutdown?) or is the
bug in the scripts (unlikely... The 'workaround' I was pointed at
scrapes the log to find out if we've just resumed... But what if the
logfilesystem is full... No log & we'll shutdown anyway, so I'd suspect
acpid myself... Anyone confirm which area is actually responsible?
TIA
Hamish.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-29 21:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-06-25 10:48 No APIC interrupts after ACPI suspend Matthew Garrett
2004-06-26 0:05 ` Hamie
2004-06-26 16:42 ` [ACPI] " David Eriksson
2004-06-26 18:03 ` Hamie
[not found] ` <40DDBA7A.6010404-CM5YN7r2dWBr4tq51QLIbdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2004-06-27 17:57 ` Hamie
[not found] ` <40DF0A98.9040604-CM5YN7r2dWBr4tq51QLIbdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2004-06-27 18:49 ` Herman Sheremetyev
[not found] ` <1088362159.2163.38.camel-l85cmlzfk8I@public.gmane.org>
2004-06-29 21:19 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-27 18:52 ` Alexander Gran
[not found] ` <200406272052.43326-qgpBcDF1kIxsXm07kNcISIFwBlHcXKVlHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2004-06-27 19:16 ` Hamie
[not found] ` <40DF1D22.2010406-CM5YN7r2dWBr4tq51QLIbdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2004-06-27 20:27 ` Hamie
2004-06-27 22:06 ` [ACPI] " Karol Kozimor
2004-06-27 19:22 ` Alexander Gran
2004-06-27 16:27 ` [ACPI] " Matthew Garrett
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-28 1:35 Li, Shaohua
2004-06-28 6:20 Li, Shaohua
2004-06-28 8:48 ` Hamie
2004-06-28 9:18 ` [ACPI] " Luca Capello
2004-06-28 20:50 ` Hamie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox