From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Deianov Subject: Re: ibm-acpi-0.1 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:21:49 -0700 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040810092149.GH28939@aero.ensim.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Li, Shaohua" Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 04:58:53PM +0800, Li, Shaohua wrote: > > >dock (ACPI drops it if it's not present at boot) and embedded > Actually supporting dock station isn't just executing _EJ0 and _DCK, you > possibly need to scan the new PCI devices under the dock station. My problem is that the docking station I have does not have a PCI bus, so I have no way of testing that. Can not scanning the bus be harmful? I guess I should make it clear that only "dumb" docks are supported for now. Patches are welcome... Thanks, Boris ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285