Re: acpi-20040715+D600+Suspend

[Cameron Patrick <cameron-O6g+VggOkbsyiAr4/NxYnBcLbHmBdUph@public.gmane.org>]

Ow Mun Heng wrote:

> > Hmm, do not use reiserfs ;-).
> Hmm.. isn't reiserfs better?
> I dunno.
> Suse uses it as their root fs.
> I've only switched to reiserfs for my FC2 install. (and frankly, like
> since I went to FC2 3+ months ago, I've had like 3 reiserfs
> --rebuild-checks) compared to like NONE  when I was on RH9/ext3 for ~8
> months.

> What's the majority of ppl using? I know this is Off-topic. sorry..

In my experience, ext3 is the best in terms of not losing any data.  I
tend to use reiserfs because it's faster, though...  I've never had to
do a reiserfs rebuild.

> XFS for my /home 20GB dir. It handles fairly well. (as long as there's
> no sudden power loss, as I read XFS caches the data aggressively and not
> to sync with the disk)

I used to use XFS.  On a few occasions it crashed hard and would
refuse to mount again (needed an xfs_recover).  I ended up with many
corrupted files full of NULL bytes, pretty much every time the machine
lost power or crashed (yay Nvidia drivers) :(

Cameron.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click