From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: Fwd: [RFC/patch] ACPI in linux PnP layer Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:01:48 -0500 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200409201801.48922.dtor_core@ameritech.net> References: <1094304174.4139c1aeb3e0f@imp4-q.free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Andrew Grover List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Monday 20 September 2004 05:04 pm, Andrew Grover wrote: > Did anyone else see Matthieu's post to lkml a while back and were > there any comments? Is this going to get applied, or if not why not? > It does uses list_for_each_safe while dropping spinlock in the body odf the loop which is not safe at all so it has to be reworked (together with the rest of acpi/scan.c) -- Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php