From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG cost Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 01:24:37 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20041029232437.GF31914@wotan.suse.de> References: <37F890616C995246BE76B3E6B2DBE0550276521D@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37F890616C995246BE76B3E6B2DBE0550276521D-sBd4vmA9Se5Qxe9IK+vIArfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Moore, Robert" Cc: Andi Kleen , "Brown, Len" , ACPI Developers List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:27:47AM -0700, Moore, Robert wrote: > The function names are certainly expensive, but why "redundant"? They > are used for more than just a call stack trace. Because the kernel has them already in the kallsyms symbol table when KALLSYMS is enabled, which it usually is now. My proposal was to pass around addresses and then just look them up before you output. -Andi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click