RE: kacpid problems

dev_zero
2004-11-10T16:14:25Z

<snip>
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [c01a7377(c11ff3fc)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [c01a5813(cddd0b28)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.
Scheduling function [ce855c48(cd245400)] for deferred
execution.

</snip

--- "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> It can be shown on your screen or from dmesg.
>
> Thanks
> Luming
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> >[mailto:acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On
> Behalf Of dev_zero
> >Sent: 2004å¹´11æœˆ11æ—¥ 0:06
> >To: Yu, Luming
> >Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> >Subject: RE: [ACPI] kacpid problems
> >
> >Where should I look for the output? In
> >/var/log/messages?
> > --- "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> Hmm, odd!
> >> Please apply following debug patch to see what
> could
> >> happen on your screen.
> >>
> >>
> >> --- edited/drivers/acpi/osl.c.0 2004-11-10
> >> 23:36:17.000000000 +0800
> >> +++ edited/drivers/acpi/osl.c 2004-11-10
> >> 23:38:56.000000000 +0800
> >> @@ -676,7 +676,7 @@
> >>
> >> ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE
> >> ("os_queue_for_execution");
> >>
> >> - ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT ((ACPI_DB_EXEC,
> "Scheduling
> >> function [%p(%p)] for deferred execution.\n",
> >> function, context));
> >> + printk( "Scheduling function [%p(%p)] for
> >> deferred execution.\n", function, context);
> >>
> >> if (!function)
> >> return_ACPI_STATUS
> >> (AE_BAD_PARAMETER);
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Luming
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: dev_zero [mailto:dev_xor-eZNTXLQAfP4@public.gmane.org]
> >> >Sent: 2004Ã¥Â¹Â´11Ã¦Å“Ë†10Ã¦â€”Â¥ 22:50
> >> >To: Yu, Luming
> >> >Subject: RE: [ACPI] kacpid problems
> >> >
> >> > CPU0
> >> > 0: 4670319 XT-PIC timer
> >> > 1: 5178 XT-PIC i8042
> >> > 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> >> > 5: 115597 XT-PIC eth0, ehci_hcd,
> >> >ohci_hcd, ohci_hcd, ohci_hcd, SiS 7012
> >> > 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc
> >> > 10: 2 XT-PIC ohci1394
> >> > 11: 6 XT-PIC acpi
> >> > 12: 165 XT-PIC i8042
> >> > 14: 6113 XT-PIC ide0
> >> > 15: 0 XT-PIC ide1
> >> >NMI: 0
> >> >LOC: 0
> >> >ERR: 0
> >> >MIS: 0
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> skrev:
> >> >>
> >> >> I want this info when kacpid runing with 99%
> CPU
> >> >> time.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> Luming
> >> >>
> >> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >> >From: dev_zero [mailto:dev_xor-eZNTXLQAfP4@public.gmane.org]
> >> >> >Sent:
> 2004ÃƒÂ¥Ã‚Â¹Ã‚Â´11ÃƒÂ¦Ã…â€œÃ‹â€ 10ÃƒÂ¦Ã¢â‚¬â€Ã‚Â¥
> 22:36
> >> >> >To: Yu, Luming;
> acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> >> >> >Subject: RE: [ACPI] kacpid problems
> >> >> >
> >> >> > CPU0
> >> >> > 0: 4079948 XT-PIC timer
> >> >> > 1: 3550 XT-PIC i8042
> >> >> > 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> >> >> > 5: 97944 XT-PIC eth0,
> ehci_hcd,
> >> >> >ohci_hcd, ohci_hcd, ohci_hcd, SiS SI7012
> >> >> > 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc
> >> >> > 10: 2 XT-PIC ohci1394
> >> >> > 11: 5 XT-PIC acpi
> >> >> > 12: 165 XT-PIC i8042
> >> >> > 14: 5380 XT-PIC ide0
> >> >> > 15: 0 XT-PIC ide1
> >> >> >NMI: 0
> >> >> >LOC: 0
> >> >> >ERR: 0
> >> >> >MIS: 0
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >btw did you find anything weird in my DSDT?
> >> >> > --- "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> >> >> >> Hmm... would you please cat
> /proc/interrupts
> >> to
> >> >> me.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> >> Luming
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> >From: dev_zero [mailto:dev_xor-eZNTXLQAfP4@public.gmane.org]
> >> >> >> >Sent:
> >>
>
2004ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¥Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â¹Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â´11ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¦Ãƒâ€¦Ã¢â‚¬Å“Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬
> 10ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¦ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬ÂÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â¥
> >> 21:34
> >> >> >> >To: Yu, Luming
> >> >> >> >Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> >> >> >> >Subject: RE: [ACPI] kacpid problems
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >kacpid still runns with 99%cpu usage when
> the
> >> >> cpu
> >> >> >> gets
> >> >> >> >too hot. I tried the game quake 2. You can
> >> play
> >> >> >> around
> >> >> >> >10 -15 minutes before the kacpid starts
> >> running
> >> >> on
> >> >> >> 99%
> >> >> >> >cpu usage. I also used quake 2 too test
> the
> >> >> kernel
> >> >> >> >before I applied your patch.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --- "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> It means there was NO event generated at
> >> that
> >> >> >> time.
> >> >> >> >> Do you think the symptom is gone with my
> >> debug
> >> >> >> >> patch?
> >> >> >> >> If so, I think your box need a more sane
> >> >> schedule
> >> >> >> >> for acpi_thermal_check
> >> >> >> >> And, I can come up with a patch.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> >> >> Luming
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> >> >From: dev_zero
> [mailto:dev_xor-eZNTXLQAfP4@public.gmane.org]
> >> >> >> >> >Sent:
> >> >>
> >>
>
>2004ÃƒÆ’Ã†â€™Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â¥ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â¹ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â´11ÃƒÆ’Ã†â€™Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â¦ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Â¦ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Â¹ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬
> >>
>
10ÃƒÆ’Ã†â€™Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â¦ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚ÂÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â¥
> >> >> 1:06
> >> >> >> >> >To: Yu, Luming
> >> >> >> >> >Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> >> >> >> >> >Subject: RE: [ACPI] kacpid problems
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >When I try to output the event file I
> do
> >> >> this:
> >> >> >> >> >[root@balder: /proc/acpi]# cat event >
> >> >> >> >> /home/event.log
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >But then It just stands there without
> >> doing
> >> >> >> >> anything.
> >> >> >> >> >So i tried to check what was wrong (ps
> ax)
> >> >> >> command:
> >> >> >> >> >2922 pts/0 S+ 0:00 cat event
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >I don't know if it is supposed to be
> >> >> suspended?
> >> >> >> >> >> I want to know what kind of events
> could
> >> be
> >> >> >> >> >> generated heavily, which could have
> >> >> >> corresponding
> >> >> >> >> >> pending execution of AML method
> issued
> >> to
> >> >> work
> >> >> >> >> queue
>
=== message truncated ===