public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7BvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org>
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] processor: jiffies-based bm_check, bugfixes
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:08:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041223140849.GE7973@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)

Make the bm_activity depend on "jiffies", instead of numbers
of the check being called. This means bus mastering activity
is assumed if bm_check isn't called; and multiple calls during
one jiffy will be |='ed.

Also, two fixups where promotion and demotion were mixed up.

Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org>
---

 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |   19 ++++++++++++++++---
 include/acpi/processor.h      |    1 +
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.10-rc3+bk-acpi/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.10-rc3+bk-acpi.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c	2004-12-23 14:25:32.385908579 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc3+bk-acpi/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c	2004-12-23 14:39:58.360081349 +0100
@@ -193,8 +193,18 @@
 	 */
 	if (pr->flags.bm_check) {
 		u32		bm_status = 0;
+		unsigned long	diff = jiffies - pr->power.bm_check_timestamp;
 
-		pr->power.bm_activity <<= 1;
+		if (diff > 32)
+			diff = 32;
+
+		while (diff) {
+			/* if we didn't get called, assume there was busmaster activity */
+			diff--;
+			if (diff)
+				pr->power.bm_activity |= 0x1;
+			pr->power.bm_activity <<= 1;
+		}
 
 		acpi_get_register(ACPI_BITREG_BUS_MASTER_STATUS,
 			&bm_status, ACPI_MTX_DO_NOT_LOCK);
@@ -213,6 +223,9 @@
 				|| (inb_p(errata.piix4.bmisx + 0x0A) & 0x01))
 				pr->power.bm_activity++;
 		}
+
+		pr->power.bm_check_timestamp = jiffies;
+
 		/*
 		 * Apply bus mastering demotion policy.  Automatically demote
 		 * to avoid a faulty transition.  Note that the processor
@@ -439,13 +452,13 @@
 
 		if (higher) {
 			cx->promotion.state  = higher;
-			cx->demotion.threshold.ticks = cx->latency_ticks;
+			cx->promotion.threshold.ticks = cx->latency_ticks;
 			if (cx->type >= ACPI_STATE_C2)
 				cx->promotion.threshold.count = 4;
 			else
 				cx->promotion.threshold.count = 10;
 			if (higher->type == ACPI_STATE_C3)
-				cx->demotion.threshold.bm = 0x0F;
+				cx->promotion.threshold.bm = 0x0F;
 		}
 
 		higher = cx;
Index: linux-2.6.10-rc3+bk-acpi/include/acpi/processor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.10-rc3+bk-acpi.orig/include/acpi/processor.h	2004-12-23 13:21:12.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc3+bk-acpi/include/acpi/processor.h	2004-12-23 14:41:47.558845116 +0100
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
 
 struct acpi_processor_power {
 	struct acpi_processor_cx *state;
+	unsigned long		bm_check_timestamp;
 	u32			default_state;
 	u32			bm_activity;
 	int			count;


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/

             reply	other threads:[~2004-12-23 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-23 14:08 Dominik Brodowski [this message]
     [not found] ` <20041223140849.GE7973-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7BvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org>
2004-12-23 20:11   ` [PATCH 5/5] processor: jiffies-based bm_check, bugfixes Len Brown
2005-01-21  4:08     ` [PATCH 5/5] processor: jiffies-based bm_check Len Brown
2005-01-21 16:23       ` Dominik Brodowski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-23 18:31 [PATCH 5/5] processor: jiffies-based bm_check, bugfixes Pallipadi, Venkatesh
     [not found] ` <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB6003A46B1D-exJ48ZlmiLpQxe9IK+vIArfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2004-12-23 20:13   ` Dominik Brodowski
     [not found]     ` <20041223201334.GA19292-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7BvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org>
2004-12-23 21:41       ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
     [not found]         ` <20041223134118.A24497-39QZ/XbsZ5/mO6KZMuUCQVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2004-12-24  9:45           ` Dominik Brodowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041223140849.GE7973@dominikbrodowski.de \
    --to=linux-x3ehhduj6siigcdfoqap7bvvk+yq3zxh@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox