From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] processor: jiffies-based bm_check, bugfixes Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:13:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20041223201334.GA19292@dominikbrodowski.de> References: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB6003A46B1D@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB6003A46B1D-exJ48ZlmiLpQxe9IK+vIArfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, "Brown, Len" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:31:50AM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > > We have another patch to fix this bm_activity history, by doing periodic > bm checks. periodic means overhead even if the system isn't idle. So I'm not convinced this is the better idea. Thanks, Dominik ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/