From: Dominik Brodowski <linux-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7BvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org>
To: Thomas Eschenbacher <Thomas.Eschenbacher-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: freqency scaling on compaq nx9010
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:08:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050113150853.GA8430@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41E1CD44.1090107-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 09:33:08PM -0300, Thomas Eschenbacher wrote:
> The file "scaling_driver" told me it was "speedstep-smi".
> (which makes no sense to me, I have an ALI and no Intel chipset...)
> No idea what it really was, I saw no kernel message about
> speedstep or so.
> (ACPI version is 20040816)
Then you used the wrong speedstep-driver, AFAICS. It is only meant for
mobile Pentium III CPUs... I need to check why it didn't fail to load.
> I kicked out all speedstep stuff from my kernel config and now I see
> 30590000 and 15960000 in
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies -
> the same values as in my DSDT, using acpi-cpufreq as driver.
>
> So what would be the advantage of speedstep over acpi-cpufreq ?
> Does it also switch core voltage or do other things?
The acpi-cpufreq driver (normally) also scales voltage, it may just be
slower than speedstep-ich or speedstep-centrino. However, it's ot faster or
slower than speedstep-smi.
Dominik
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-13 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-09 22:47 freqency scaling on compaq nx9010 Thomas Eschenbacher
[not found] ` <41E1B46D.1070107-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2005-01-09 22:56 ` Dominik Brodowski
[not found] ` <20050109225655.GA27910-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7BvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org>
2005-01-10 0:33 ` Thomas Eschenbacher
[not found] ` <41E1CD44.1090107-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2005-01-13 15:08 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050113150853.GA8430@dominikbrodowski.de \
--to=linux-x3ehhduj6siigcdfoqap7bvvk+yq3zxh@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Thomas.Eschenbacher-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox