Re: [PATCH] Sanitize ACPI Kconfig

[Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>]

Hi!

> > > > neccessary if you want to go 2GHz with your athlon64 laptop (or it is
> > > > 800MHz), so I'd say enable it.
> > >
> > > My desktop boxes and servers all don't care about battery or AC.
> > >
> > > But I'm not opposed to turning it on, just the "m" default is quite
> > > useless.
> >
> > I'd say that 'y' there makes sense, but anything is better than 'm'.
> I really do not understand this.  Having is as a module wastes a bit of disk
> space (usually not a problem) but means that they can be loaded if wanted
> either by loading them manually or by using acpid.  Having them as y forces
> them to be there and some systems with dodgy ACPI implementations will
> have problems, and having them not there means that Joe User has to 

We want to get maximum testing. If there's some dodgy machine, we want
to have it fixed. [I do not believe I seen such dodgy machines in
recent history.]
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt