From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] Sanitize ACPI Kconfig Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:14:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20050119221405.GA17325@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050107212259.GA13026@wotan.suse.de> <200501171158.51388.david.goodenough@btconnect.com> <20050119121516.GA22856@elf.ucw.cz> <200501192155.48623.david.goodenough@btconnect.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501192155.48623.david.goodenough-6b45v/Ft3lbby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: David Goodenough Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > We want to get maximum testing. If there's some dodgy machine, we want > > to have it fixed. [I do not believe I seen such dodgy machines in > > recent history.] > > Pavel > I think you will find that many people are still using APM because they do not > trust ACPI on their machines. This may be misplaced but forcing ACPI to be > built always may be misunderstood by those people. I'm not talking about forcing people to do anything, we were talking about defconfig, only. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl