From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core-yWtbtysYrB+LZ21kGMrzwg@public.gmane.org>
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Cc: Rich Townsend <rhdt-OBnUx95tOyn10jlvfTC4gA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change spinlock mutex to semaphor in ec.c
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:55:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200502040055.53765.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4202C0A4.1020700-OBnUx95tOyn10jlvfTC4gA@public.gmane.org>
On Thursday 03 February 2005 19:24, Rich Townsend wrote:
> Hi all --
>
> Attached is a patch against the 2.6.10 kernel, to convert the mutexing
> in the embdedded controller driver from a spinlock to a semaphore. The
> rationale behind this is to permit sleeping inside the acpi_ec_wait()
> polling routine.
>
Hi,
Last time such patch was proposed there were some concerns regarding
possible interrupt storm, see the follwing thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=110055992814866&w=2
I have an alternative patch that tries to address these concerns,
unfortunately I do not have a box with EC controller so it is
completely untested.
--
Dmitry
===================================================================
ChangeSet@1.1997, 2005-02-04 00:43:27-05:00, dtor_core-yWtbtysYrB+LZ21kGMrzwg@public.gmane.org
ACPI: EC - switch from busy-polling to event-based completion
signalling. EC operations take quite a long time and busy
polling with interrupts disabled causes big latencies or
even losing timer interrupts.
EC IO timeout has been increased from 10 to 50ms.
Also get rid of unneeded variable initializations.
Based on patch by Andi Kleen <ak-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
ec.c | 264 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
===================================================================
diff -Nru a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c 2005-02-04 00:47:16 -05:00
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c 2005-02-04 00:47:16 -05:00
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
#include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
@@ -51,11 +52,7 @@
#define ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF 0x02 /* Input buffer full */
#define ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI 0x20 /* EC-SCI occurred */
-#define ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF 0x01 /* Output buffer full */
-#define ACPI_EC_EVENT_IBE 0x02 /* Input buffer empty */
-
-#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY 100 /* Poll @ 100us increments */
-#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY_COUNT 1000 /* Wait 10ms max. during EC ops */
+#define ACPI_EC_DELAY 50 /* Wait 50ms max. during EC ops */
#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY_GLK 1000 /* Wait 1ms max. to get global lock */
#define ACPI_EC_COMMAND_READ 0x80
@@ -86,8 +83,11 @@
struct acpi_generic_address status_addr;
struct acpi_generic_address command_addr;
struct acpi_generic_address data_addr;
+ u32 data;
unsigned long global_lock;
- spinlock_t lock;
+ unsigned int rw_in_progress;
+ struct semaphore sem;
+ wait_queue_head_t wait;
};
/* If we find an EC via the ECDT, we need to keep a ptr to its context */
@@ -100,53 +100,40 @@
Transaction Management
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-static int
-acpi_ec_wait (
- struct acpi_ec *ec,
- u8 event)
+static inline u32 acpi_ec_read_status(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
- u32 acpi_ec_status = 0;
- u32 i = ACPI_EC_UDELAY_COUNT;
+ u32 status = 0;
- if (!ec)
- return -EINVAL;
+ acpi_hw_low_level_read(8, &status, &ec->status_addr);
+ return status;
+}
- /* Poll the EC status register waiting for the event to occur. */
- switch (event) {
- case ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF:
- do {
- acpi_hw_low_level_read(8, &acpi_ec_status, &ec->status_addr);
- if (acpi_ec_status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_OBF)
- return 0;
- udelay(ACPI_EC_UDELAY);
- } while (--i>0);
- break;
- case ACPI_EC_EVENT_IBE:
- do {
- acpi_hw_low_level_read(8, &acpi_ec_status, &ec->status_addr);
- if (!(acpi_ec_status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF))
- return 0;
- udelay(ACPI_EC_UDELAY);
- } while (--i>0);
- break;
- default:
- return -EINVAL;
+static inline void acpi_ec_prepare_for_wait(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+{
+ ec->rw_in_progress = 1;
+ mb();
+}
+
+static int acpi_ec_wait(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+{
+ if (wait_event_timeout(ec->wait, !ec->rw_in_progress,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY)) == 0) {
+ ec->rw_in_progress = 0;
+ return -ETIME;
}
- return -ETIME;
+ return 0;
}
-
static int
acpi_ec_read (
struct acpi_ec *ec,
u8 address,
u32 *data)
{
- acpi_status status = AE_OK;
- int result = 0;
- unsigned long flags = 0;
- u32 glk = 0;
+ acpi_status status;
+ int result;
+ u32 glk;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ec_read");
@@ -160,27 +147,29 @@
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return_VALUE(-ENODEV);
}
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
+ WARN_ON(in_interrupt());
+ down(&ec->sem);
+
+ acpi_ec_prepare_for_wait(ec);
acpi_hw_low_level_write(8, ACPI_EC_COMMAND_READ, &ec->command_addr);
- result = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_IBE);
+ result = acpi_ec_wait(ec);
if (result)
goto end;
+ acpi_ec_prepare_for_wait(ec);
acpi_hw_low_level_write(8, address, &ec->data_addr);
- result = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF);
+ result = acpi_ec_wait(ec);
if (result)
goto end;
-
- acpi_hw_low_level_read(8, data, &ec->data_addr);
+ *data = ec->data;
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Read [%02x] from address [%02x]\n",
*data, address));
end:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
+ up(&ec->sem);
if (ec->global_lock)
acpi_release_global_lock(glk);
@@ -195,10 +184,9 @@
u8 address,
u8 data)
{
- int result = 0;
- acpi_status status = AE_OK;
- unsigned long flags = 0;
- u32 glk = 0;
+ int result;
+ acpi_status status;
+ u32 glk;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ec_write");
@@ -211,20 +199,24 @@
return_VALUE(-ENODEV);
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
+ WARN_ON(in_interrupt());
+ down(&ec->sem);
+ acpi_ec_prepare_for_wait(ec);
acpi_hw_low_level_write(8, ACPI_EC_COMMAND_WRITE, &ec->command_addr);
- result = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_IBE);
+ result = acpi_ec_wait(ec);
if (result)
goto end;
+ acpi_ec_prepare_for_wait(ec);
acpi_hw_low_level_write(8, address, &ec->data_addr);
- result = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_IBE);
+ result = acpi_ec_wait(ec);
if (result)
goto end;
+ acpi_ec_prepare_for_wait(ec);
acpi_hw_low_level_write(8, data, &ec->data_addr);
- result = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_IBE);
+ result = acpi_ec_wait(ec);
if (result)
goto end;
@@ -232,7 +224,7 @@
data, address));
end:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
+ up(&ec->sem);
if (ec->global_lock)
acpi_release_global_lock(glk);
@@ -289,10 +281,9 @@
struct acpi_ec *ec,
u32 *data)
{
- int result = 0;
- acpi_status status = AE_OK;
- unsigned long flags = 0;
- u32 glk = 0;
+ int result;
+ acpi_status status;
+ u32 glk;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ec_query");
@@ -312,20 +303,18 @@
* Note that successful completion of the query causes the ACPI_EC_SCI
* bit to be cleared (and thus clearing the interrupt source).
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
-
+ acpi_ec_prepare_for_wait(ec);
acpi_hw_low_level_write(8, ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY, &ec->command_addr);
- result = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF);
+ result = acpi_ec_wait(ec);
if (result)
goto end;
-
- acpi_hw_low_level_read(8, data, &ec->data_addr);
+
+ *data = ec->data;
+
if (!*data)
result = -ENODATA;
end:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
-
if (ec->global_lock)
acpi_release_global_lock(glk);
@@ -342,38 +331,63 @@
u8 data;
};
+static void acpi_ec_check_rw_complete(struct acpi_ec *ec, u32 status)
+{
+ u32 data = 0;
+
+ if (status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_OBF)
+ acpi_hw_low_level_read(8, &data, &ec->data_addr);
+
+ if (ec->rw_in_progress &&
+ ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_OBF) || (~status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF))) {
+ ec->data = data;
+ ec->rw_in_progress = 0;
+ wake_up(&ec->wait);
+ }
+}
+
static void
acpi_ec_gpe_query (
void *ec_cxt)
{
struct acpi_ec *ec = (struct acpi_ec *) ec_cxt;
- u32 value = 0;
- unsigned long flags = 0;
+ u32 value;
+ int result = -ENODATA;
static char object_name[5] = {'_','Q','0','0','\0'};
const char hex[] = {'0','1','2','3','4','5','6','7',
'8','9','A','B','C','D','E','F'};
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ec_gpe_query");
- if (!ec_cxt)
- goto end;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
- acpi_hw_low_level_read(8, &value, &ec->command_addr);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
-
- /* TBD: Implement asynch events!
- * NOTE: All we care about are EC-SCI's. Other EC events are
- * handled via polling (yuck!). This is because some systems
- * treat EC-SCIs as level (versus EDGE!) triggered, preventing
- * a purely interrupt-driven approach (grumble, grumble).
+ /*
+ * Because some systems treat EC-SCIs as level (versus EDGE!)
+ * triggered we can not just check SCI flag here. If there is
+ * a reader/writer waiting on response we need to wait till
+ * data is available and wake it up. Only when there is no
+ * outstanding requests we can finally service SCI.
*/
- if (!(value & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI))
- goto end;
- if (acpi_ec_query(ec, &value))
+ while (unlikely(down_trylock(&ec->sem))) {
+
+ /* Reader or writer is waiting holding ec->sem */
+ value = acpi_ec_read_status(ec);
+ acpi_ec_check_rw_complete(ec, value);
+
+ /*
+ * Even if we never get IBE/OBF condition client
+ * will eventually time out allowing us proceed.
+ */
+ msleep(1);
+ }
+
+ if (acpi_ec_read_status(ec) & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI)
+ result = acpi_ec_query(ec, &value);
+
+ up(&ec->sem);
+
+ if (result)
goto end;
-
+
object_name[2] = hex[((value >> 4) & 0x0F)];
object_name[3] = hex[(value & 0x0F)];
@@ -390,6 +404,7 @@
void *data)
{
acpi_status status = AE_OK;
+ u32 value;
struct acpi_ec *ec = (struct acpi_ec *) data;
if (!ec)
@@ -397,13 +412,15 @@
acpi_disable_gpe(NULL, ec->gpe_bit, ACPI_ISR);
- status = acpi_os_queue_for_execution(OSD_PRIORITY_GPE,
- acpi_ec_gpe_query, ec);
+ value = acpi_ec_read_status(ec);
+ acpi_ec_check_rw_complete(ec, value);
- if (status == AE_OK)
- return ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED;
- else
- return ACPI_INTERRUPT_NOT_HANDLED;
+ if (value & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI)
+ status = acpi_os_queue_for_execution(OSD_PRIORITY_GPE,
+ acpi_ec_gpe_query, ec);
+
+ return status == AE_OK ?
+ ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED : ACPI_INTERRUPT_NOT_HANDLED;
}
/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -421,10 +438,8 @@
* The EC object is in the handler context and is needed
* when calling the acpi_ec_space_handler.
*/
- if(function == ACPI_REGION_DEACTIVATE)
- *return_context = NULL;
- else
- *return_context = handler_context;
+ *return_context = (function != ACPI_REGION_DEACTIVATE) ?
+ handler_context : NULL;
return AE_OK;
}
@@ -439,9 +454,9 @@
void *handler_context,
void *region_context)
{
- int result = 0;
- struct acpi_ec *ec = NULL;
- u32 temp = 0;
+ int result;
+ struct acpi_ec *ec;
+ u32 temp;
acpi_integer f_v = 0;
int i = 0;
@@ -450,7 +465,7 @@
if ((address > 0xFF) || !value || !handler_context)
return_VALUE(AE_BAD_PARAMETER);
- if(bit_width != 8) {
+ if (bit_width != 8) {
printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "acpi_ec_space_handler: bit_width should be 8\n");
if (acpi_strict)
return_VALUE(AE_BAD_PARAMETER);
@@ -474,23 +489,23 @@
}
bit_width -= 8;
- if(bit_width){
+ if (bit_width) {
- if(function == ACPI_READ)
+ if (function == ACPI_READ)
f_v |= (acpi_integer) (*value) << 8*i;
- if(function == ACPI_WRITE)
- (*value) >>=8;
+ if (function == ACPI_WRITE)
+ (*value) >>=8;
i++;
goto next_byte;
}
- if(function == ACPI_READ){
+ if (function == ACPI_READ) {
f_v |= (acpi_integer) (*value) << 8*i;
*value = f_v;
}
-
+
out:
switch (result) {
case -EINVAL:
@@ -505,8 +520,6 @@
default:
return_VALUE(AE_OK);
}
-
-
}
@@ -532,7 +545,7 @@
seq_printf(seq, "ports: 0x%02x, 0x%02x\n",
(u32) ec->status_addr.address, (u32) ec->data_addr.address);
seq_printf(seq, "use global lock: %s\n",
- ec->global_lock?"yes":"no");
+ ec->global_lock ? "yes" : "no");
end:
return_VALUE(0);
@@ -555,7 +568,7 @@
acpi_ec_add_fs (
struct acpi_device *device)
{
- struct proc_dir_entry *entry = NULL;
+ struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ec_add_fs");
@@ -606,9 +619,9 @@
acpi_ec_add (
struct acpi_device *device)
{
- int result = 0;
- acpi_status status = AE_OK;
- struct acpi_ec *ec = NULL;
+ int result;
+ acpi_status status;
+ struct acpi_ec *ec;
unsigned long uid;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ec_add");
@@ -623,7 +636,8 @@
ec->handle = device->handle;
ec->uid = -1;
- spin_lock_init(&ec->lock);
+ init_MUTEX(&ec->sem);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&ec->wait);
strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_EC_DEVICE_NAME);
strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_EC_CLASS);
acpi_driver_data(device) = ec;
@@ -637,7 +651,7 @@
if (ec_ecdt && ec_ecdt->uid == uid) {
acpi_remove_address_space_handler(ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
ACPI_ADR_SPACE_EC, &acpi_ec_space_handler);
-
+
acpi_remove_gpe_handler(NULL, ec_ecdt->gpe_bit, &acpi_ec_gpe_handler);
kfree(ec_ecdt);
@@ -677,7 +691,7 @@
struct acpi_device *device,
int type)
{
- struct acpi_ec *ec = NULL;
+ struct acpi_ec *ec;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ec_remove");
@@ -732,8 +746,8 @@
acpi_ec_start (
struct acpi_device *device)
{
- acpi_status status = AE_OK;
- struct acpi_ec *ec = NULL;
+ acpi_status status;
+ struct acpi_ec *ec;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ec_start");
@@ -789,8 +803,8 @@
struct acpi_device *device,
int type)
{
- acpi_status status = AE_OK;
- struct acpi_ec *ec = NULL;
+ acpi_status status;
+ struct acpi_ec *ec;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ec_stop");
@@ -824,6 +838,7 @@
acpi_ec_io_ports, ec_ecdt);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return status;
+
ec_ecdt->status_addr = ec_ecdt->command_addr;
ec_ecdt->uid = -1;
@@ -832,7 +847,9 @@
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_GPE", NULL, &ec_ecdt->gpe_bit);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return status;
- spin_lock_init(&ec_ecdt->lock);
+
+ init_MUTEX(&ec_ecdt->sem);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&ec_ecdt->wait);
ec_ecdt->global_lock = TRUE;
ec_ecdt->handle = handle;
@@ -890,7 +907,7 @@
acpi_status status;
struct acpi_table_ecdt *ecdt_ptr;
- status = acpi_get_firmware_table("ECDT", 1, ACPI_LOGICAL_ADDRESSING,
+ status = acpi_get_firmware_table("ECDT", 1, ACPI_LOGICAL_ADDRESSING,
(struct acpi_table_header **) &ecdt_ptr);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return -ENODEV;
@@ -905,11 +922,12 @@
return -ENOMEM;
memset(ec_ecdt, 0, sizeof(struct acpi_ec));
+ init_MUTEX(&ec_ecdt->sem);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&ec_ecdt->wait);
ec_ecdt->command_addr = ecdt_ptr->ec_control;
ec_ecdt->status_addr = ecdt_ptr->ec_control;
ec_ecdt->data_addr = ecdt_ptr->ec_data;
ec_ecdt->gpe_bit = ecdt_ptr->gpe_bit;
- spin_lock_init(&ec_ecdt->lock);
/* use the GL just to be safe */
ec_ecdt->global_lock = TRUE;
ec_ecdt->uid = ecdt_ptr->uid;
@@ -978,7 +996,7 @@
static int __init acpi_ec_init (void)
{
- int result = 0;
+ int result;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ec_init");
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-04 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-04 0:24 [PATCH] Change spinlock mutex to semaphor in ec.c Rich Townsend
[not found] ` <4202C0A4.1020700-OBnUx95tOyn10jlvfTC4gA@public.gmane.org>
2005-02-04 5:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
[not found] ` <200502040055.53765.dtor_core-yWtbtysYrB+LZ21kGMrzwg@public.gmane.org>
2005-02-04 18:26 ` Rich Townsend
[not found] ` <4203BE69.50004-OBnUx95tOyn10jlvfTC4gA@public.gmane.org>
2005-02-07 7:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-04 6:31 Yu, Luming
2005-02-04 6:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
[not found] ` <200502040150.25175.dtor_core-yWtbtysYrB+LZ21kGMrzwg@public.gmane.org>
2005-02-04 12:05 ` Rich Townsend
[not found] ` <42036527.4030807-OBnUx95tOyn10jlvfTC4gA@public.gmane.org>
2005-02-04 13:53 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200502040055.53765.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--to=dtor_core-ywtbtysyrb+lz21kgmrzwg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rhdt-OBnUx95tOyn10jlvfTC4gA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox