From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Eaton Subject: Re: DSDT errors Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:45:50 +1000 Message-ID: <200502161145.50388.meaton@vasco.com> References: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E96D4F8@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E96D4F8-sBd4vmA9Se5Qxe9IK+vIArfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Ok so the problem probably isn't the dsdt. Thanks. On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:36 am, you wrote: > But actually, we don't look at the return value anyway (yet) > > Status = AcpiEvaluateObject (NULL, METHOD_NAME__WAK, &ArgList, NULL); > if (ACPI_FAILURE (Status) && Status != AE_NOT_FOUND) > { > ACPI_REPORT_ERROR (("Method _WAK failed, %s\n", AcpiFormatException > (Status))); } > /* TBD: _WAK "sometimes" returns stuff - do we want to look at it? */ > > -- Mark Eaton meaton-tw97OP0PknkAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click