From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc4-mm1: something is wrong with swsusp powerdown Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:54:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20050301105448.GG1345@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050228231721.GA1326@elf.ucw.cz> <20050301015231.091b5329.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050301015231.091b5329.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, barryn@pobox.com, marado@student.dei.uc.pt, "Eric W. Biederman" , acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Len Brown List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > In `subj` kernel, machine no longer powers down at the end of > > swsusp. 2.6.11-rc5-pavel works ok, as does 2.6.11-bk. > > Binary searching indicates that this is due to > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc5/2.6.11-rc5-mm1/broken-out/acpi_power_off-bug-fix.patch. > > I'll drop it. That patch is pretty ugly-looking anyway (ACPI code in > drivers/base/power/?). > > Perhaps someone who is hitting the problem which that patch addresses could > raise a bugzilla entry. > > Oh. It has one. http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 > > Anyway. It needs more work. Yes, the patch is very ugly. If something like this needs to be done, then perhaps acpi should properly register into driver model and do the work there. This will also mean code will be called consistently. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!