Re: Fwd: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

Shawn Starr
2005-04-01T04:32:26Z

To further, is /proc/acpi deprecated? or is some of the duplicate
functionality such as suspending going to be removed?

If so, the patch won't be worth writing if its being removed :)

Shawn.

On March 30, 2005 02:08, you wrote:
> Good question. could you write a patch for what you said.
>
> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 14:42, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > Right, but then why is it trying to do 'something' even if there is no S1
> > support? :)
> >
> > it should do the same thing if i echo 1 to /sys/power/state. which is
> > nothing at all.
> >
> > Shawn.
> >
> > On March 30, 2005 01:37, Yu, Luming wrote:
> > > On Monday 28 March 2005 16:02, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > > > However, trying echo "1" to /proc/acpi/sleep the system attempts to
> > > > (standby) and aborts:
> > > >
> > > > [4295945.236000] PM: Preparing system for suspend
> > > > [4295946.270000] Stopping tasks:
> > > > =====================================================================
> > > >== == == == [4295946.370000] Restarting tasks... done
> > > >
> > > > We get no reason as to why it quickly aborts.
> > >
> > > echo 1 to acpi/sleep means S1 called standby.
> > > echo 3 to acpi/sleep means S3 called STR: sleep to ram
> > > echo 4 to acpi/sleep means S4 called STD: sleep to disk
> > >
> > > If you system just support S0, S3, S4, S5,
> > > NO S1 support.

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc:
A global provider of Threat Management Solutions.
Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today!