From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruno Ducrot Subject: Re: Re: _CST implementation Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:45:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20050420094556.GN2298@poupinou.org> References: <1113598244.8367.30.camel@scotchmobil> <20050418120744.GG2298@poupinou.org> <4263EDA2.4030106@suse.de> <20050419092251.GK2298@poupinou.org> <4264F251.5030705@suse.de> <20050419134518.GL2298@poupinou.org> <20050419200505.GE19499@message-id.gmane0305.slipkontur.de> <42656601.3060304@bartol.udel.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42656601.3060304-OBnUx95tOyn10jlvfTC4gA@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Rich Townsend Cc: Stefan Seyfried , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:11:45PM -0400, Rich Townsend wrote: > Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:45:18PM +0200, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > > > > > >>IOW, from spec we should not invalidate, but from "common practice" by > >>bios writters, we should invalidate. > > > > > > What about a "spec_compliant_but_beware_of_stupid_bios_writers" module > > parameter? ;-) > > I fear that would be set to nonzero on every system... > That's the case already. This is the boot parameter acpi=strict -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728