From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rolf Eike Beer Subject: Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] Re: [ACPI] [RFC/PATCH 1/3] ACPI based I/O APIC hot-plug Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:53:19 +0200 Message-ID: <200504220953.20831@bilbo.math.uni-mannheim.de> References: <4267AD13.5080900@jp.fujitsu.com> <1114104091.2784.40.camel@eeyore> <42689BE6.4040004@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <42689BE6.4040004@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org To: pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Kenji Kaneshige , Bjorn Helgaas , Andrew Morton , Len Brown , "Luck, Tony" , Greg KH , acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 22. April 2005 08:38 schrieb Kenji Kaneshige: > Hi Bjorn, > > Nitpick: these declarations should follow the style of the rest > > of the file, i.e., add a space between the function name and the > > opening parenthesis. > > Thank you very much for comments. > I'll update my patches based on your comments. No, please don't do this. It just causes me to send another patch to kill them alltogether. Eike