From: Andrew Morton <akpm-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman"
<ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: mmokrejs-FKSC99mem8wheYDy1lqhK0JFmxxWawaa@public.gmane.org,
sjordet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
fastboot-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org,
zlatko.calusic-2lF7rBilFQQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-xyiX3/p4JzBDPfheJLI6IQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] Fw: Problems with reboot/poweroff on SMP machine
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:22:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050726002258.1591de62.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1oe8qf4er.fsf-T1Yj925okcoyDheHMi7gv2pdwda3JcWeAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
(Added acpi people)
ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>
> ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>
> > Martin MOKREJ___ <mmokrejs-FKSC99mem8wheYDy1lqhK0JFmxxWawaa@public.gmane.org> writes:
> >
> >> Hi Eric,
> >> I don't know if I was epxected to test this right away, but
> >> I just tried over acpi patched sources on my i686:
> >
> > Thanks. That is my bug.
> >
> > I knew the code wasn't quite right but I missed how off it
> > was :)
> >
> > Just remove the BUG_ON(!shutdown_prepared) line and it should
> > compile. I don't know why I though I could read a static
> > variable in another function...
>
> I am now officially confused. My patch might clean up a corner
> case or two but it really should not help, because the issue
> I was worried about is mostly fixed.
>
> All of the pieces are there for the acpi power off case to work
> correctly so is beginning to look like a completely different bug
> then what I am suspecting. Anyone who can testing of my patch
> would be a help.
>
> The only other interesting data point I can think of at the moment
> is the attached patch below.
>
> I want to know if acpi_power_off is having problems because interrupts
> get disabled.
I have a vague feeling that adding local_irq_disable() to acpi_power_off()
is illegal.
void acpi_power_off(void)
{
printk("%s called\n", __FUNCTION__);
local_irq_disable();
acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5);
}
Can an ACPI person please comment?
> Eric
>
> diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/i8259.c b/arch/i386/kernel/i8259.c
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/i8259.c
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/i8259.c
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static struct sysdev_class i8259_sysdev_
> set_kset_name("i8259"),
> .suspend = i8259A_suspend,
> .resume = i8259A_resume,
> - .shutdown = i8259A_shutdown,
> +// .shutdown = i8259A_shutdown,
> };
>
> static struct sys_device device_i8259A = {
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id\x16492&op=click
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-26 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050725142951.6d47ca32.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <m1ackah4r3.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
[not found] ` <42E5B533.60107@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
[not found] ` <m1sly2fbw0.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
[not found] ` <m1oe8qf4er.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
[not found] ` <m1oe8qf4er.fsf-T1Yj925okcoyDheHMi7gv2pdwda3JcWeAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2005-07-26 7:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
[not found] ` <20050726002258.1591de62.akpm-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>
2005-07-26 7:44 ` [Fastboot] Fw: Problems with reboot/poweroff on SMP machine Eric W. Biederman
2005-07-26 9:13 ` Martin MOKREJŠ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050726002258.1591de62.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm-3nddppzayc0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fastboot-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-xyiX3/p4JzBDPfheJLI6IQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mmokrejs-FKSC99mem8wheYDy1lqhK0JFmxxWawaa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sjordet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=zlatko.calusic-2lF7rBilFQQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox