From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: ACPI objects in containers not added to namespace? Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 19:53:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20050820185307.GA10903@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20050820184616.GA10878@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050820184616.GA10878-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:46:16PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > I have a machine with some devices (a serial port and an IR interface) > that don't show up in /sys/bus/pnp if acpipnp is used. Looking at the > DSDT, it seems that they're children of a generic container object > (PNP0A06). Should they be showing up in /sys/bus/pnp? Sorry, please ignore that - I'd picked up the wrong laptop. Doh. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf