From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Software coordination of frequency across CPUs sharing common P-state Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:31:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20050901193154.GD24910@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Brown, Len" Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Dominik Brodowski , cpufreq , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, "Shah, Rajesh" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 03:20:33PM -0400, Brown, Len wrote: > > >I had rebased my patch over Len's acpi-20050815-2.6.13 . Probably > >some part of it is still not in git that is causing the conflict. > >I will rebase the patch with latest git, before I resend the patch. > > FYI we're planning to send this ACPI patch to Linus in the next > few days. It includes a huge Lindent flag-day, so we really > want to get it into 2.6.14 extremely early, but we need to > button up a few things first. Ok, given Linus seems to now be away (for a week?) this gives a bit of time for Venkatesh to get his bits in shape before you do your merge. It should all just work out in time :) Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf